COMPANY
TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS
CONTACTS
SHOPPING MALL
EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL CASE
Area - 150 000 m2
Peak electricity load - 8,7 MW
Peak – heating load - 7,5 MW
Heating provided by a gas-fired boiler
Annual electricity consumption – 40 mn kWh
Annual heat consumption – 11 mn kWh
Annual natural gas consumption – 1 mn m3
CO2 emissions:
Scope 1 – 2,200 t
Tier 1+2 – 16,800 t
STANDARD SOLUTION
Area - 150 000 m2
Peak electricity load - 8,7 MW
Peak – heating load - 7,5 MW
Heating provided by a gas-fired boiler
Annual electricity consumption – 40 mn kWh
Annual heat consumption – 11 mn kWh
Annual natural gas consumption – 1 mn m3
CO2 emissions:
Scope 1 – 2,200 t
Tier 1+2 – 16,800 t
Capital cost
Cost savings
Payback period
NPV (@10%)
Incl
Incl
GSHP
Grid connection
Fuel cost reduction
Carbon emission reduction
14,1 mn
Eur 6,9 mn
Eur 7,1 mn
0,277 mn
-9,6 mn
Eur 0,078 mn
Eur 0,199 mn
51 years
STANDARD SOLUTION
Substitute boiler with 7,5 MW ground source heat pump (GSHP)
Electricity consumption goes up to 44 mn kWh p.a.
Peak electric load goes up to 10,6 MW. which is above the current substation capacity of 10 MW – construction of a new substation is required
SMART MICROGRID
Demand side control IoT based system
Demand side IoT based control system - >3000 sensors – power load, thermal comfort, lighting, air quality, equipment parameters
Integration with the BMS system, use existing controls
Integration with commercial metering
Integration with existing submetering
Integration with customer counters
Integration with external data sources – weather forecast, electricity market data
Digital twin
Microgrid
IoT Equipment control, sensors
Power loads, DR, emissions
Big Data
Analysis/visualization
Microgrid generation and energy flow control
Smart Energy Storage
Mesh optimization: Digital Twin + Machine Learning
ENERGY DROID AI CONTROL SYSTEM
Energy storage
Energy router with battery storage replacing UPS
Ice storge
Thermal storage
Generation
Solar PV
Ground source heat pumps
SYSTEM INSTALLATION RESULT AND SOLVED PROBLEMS
Total system cost Eur 2,6 mn
Payback -3,5 years
Demand side optimization
IoT based model predictive (digital twin) HVAC and other electric load control:
reducing heat consumption by 56%
Reduced peak heat consumption by 58%
Increase heat pump efficiency (COP) by 20%
Decrease total electricity consumption by 9%
Decrease peak electric consumption by 18%
Energy storage and demand response:
Thermal storage
Ice storage
Battery storge instead of UPS
Cut peak thermal consumption by 30%
Cut peak electric consumption by 12%
Reduce balancing and capacity charge, earn revenues in the demand response and frequency control markets
Generation
GSHP -1,2 MW
Use biofuel for peak loads (<3% a year) and as reserve fuel
An AI based Microgrid dispatch system chooses the optimal mode of operation of all equipment – demand-side, storage, supply
Economics of the smart microgrid solution
Capital cost
Cost savings
Payback period
NPV (@10%)
Incl
Incl
GSHP
Smart microgrid
Fuel cost reduction
Carbon emission reduction
2,6 mn
Eur 1,1 mn
Eur 1,5 mn
0,797 mn
36,6 mn
Eur 0,256 mn
Eur 0,199 mn
3,3 years
Electricity cost reduction
Eur 0,343 mn
(energy storage and control)
THE SMART MICROGRID CREATED VALUE OF EUR 37 MN
All rights reserved
14.3
2.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.245
0.772
0
10
20
30
3.5
40
50
60
70
58
-10
-5
-6.9
0
5
17.5
10
15
20
Standart solution
Smart microgrid
Standart solution
Smart microgrid
Smart microgrid
Standart solution
Smart microgrid
Stan
dart soluti
on
Payback period, years
NPV Eur, mn
Opex savings mn Eur
Capital cost, Euro mn
EnZu Energie Zukunft GmbH
DE320942794
+49 302 061 6200
Friedrichstr, 95
10117 Berlin
Office in Dubai
Tel. +1 847 323 8651
admin@en-zu.de
Office in Europe
Tel. +39 331 782 8481
admin@en-zu.de